Site
Corrections
Every factual fix made to a published article, newest first.
When an article gets something wrong, it is corrected and the correction is logged here with what was wrong and what changed. The Editorial Policy explains how corrections work. To report an error, see Contact.
Starship Flight 14 reaches orbit, splashes down early
What was wrong. Our Key takeaways called Flight 14's 26 Starlink V3 satellites the first V3 units SpaceX plans to deploy.
What changed. Starship Flight 13 already released 20 V3 satellites on a suborbital path in July, and they reentered as planned. The article now says Flight 14 carries the first V3 satellites meant to stay in orbit and join the constellation.
Meta Connect 2026: $1,299 VR Glasses, new Ray-Bans and Muse
What was wrong. Our FAQ named only the US as where Muse is available.
What changed. That was true at its September 8 launch. Meta's Connect recap now lists the US, Canada and Mexico, and the FAQ says so, with a link.
Polymarket fake bets: how the influencer campaign worked
What was wrong. We said The Wall Street Journal found the bets were fake by searching public blockchain trading records.
What changed. The Journal spotted them through differences between the real site and the copies, and used public trading data to work out the real outcomes.
Polymarket fake bets: how the influencer campaign worked
What was wrong. We dated the Schiff and Curtis letter to the CFTC June 29.
What changed. It was reported on June 26. The article now gives that date.
Polymarket fake bets: how the influencer campaign worked
What was wrong. We said the class action claims false advertising and fraud.
What changed. It makes a single claim under D.C.'s consumer protection law (the CPPA).
Polymarket fake bets: how the influencer campaign worked
What was wrong. We said the Moeller v. Blockratize class action was filed in federal court on September 2.
What changed. It was filed in D.C. Superior Court (complaint dated July 2) and moved to federal court on September 2.
iPhone Duo vs Xiaomi 18 Fold: specs and buying trade-offs
What was wrong. We said Mrwhosetheboss had not yet tested third-party apps on his own iPhone Duo.
What changed. He does not have his own iPhone Duo yet; he saw only its pre-installed apps. The article now says that.
iPhone Duo vs Xiaomi 18 Fold: specs and buying trade-offs
What was wrong. We said the TheAgusCTS scorecard gave most categories to the Xiaomi 18 Fold.
What changed. It puts Xiaomi ahead in three categories (processor, battery, charging), Apple in one (display), and calls the other four ties. The article now says so.
iPhone Duo: price, specs, release date and early reviews
What was wrong. We said early reports suggested the crease would not bother you in everyday use.
What changed. We found no source for that claim and removed it. The article now quotes what a named reviewer actually said about the crease.
iPhone Duo: price, specs, release date and early reviews
What was wrong. We said Android Authority's photo test found the iPhone Duo's under-display camera soft and hazy.
What changed. That test used three other phones with under-display cameras, not the iPhone Duo. The claim is removed, and the article says no photo test of the Duo's inner camera had been published as of September 23, 2026.
iPhone Duo durability: hinge design, patents and unknowns
What was wrong. We described BIEL Crystal as a second source of the ultra-thin glass.
What changed. The report says BIEL Crystal makes cover plates. The supplier list now says that.
iPhone Duo durability: hinge design, patents and unknowns
What was wrong. We said Apple's hinge patents go back 27 years.
What changed. The earliest one cited was filed in 1998, 28 years ago. The article now says 28.
iPhone Duo durability: hinge design, patents and unknowns
What was wrong. We dated the Jiemian News report on the 60% assembly yield September 21.
What changed. The report is dated September 17; September 21 is when 36Kr published its English version. The article now gives the original date.
iPhone Duo vs Xiaomi 18 Fold: specs and buying trade-offs
What was wrong. We said the Xiaomi 18 Fold has a bigger battery than the iPhone Duo.
What changed. Apple does not publish the Duo's battery capacity, so no capacity comparison is possible. The article now gives Xiaomi's 6,000 mAh as stated and compares only rated wireless charging, where both makers publish a figure.